Reading	Research	-
Help	Orientation  [Support]  Lesson |  Practice	-	10 of 46

Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Anderson-Inman, L. (1995). Computer-assisted outlining: Informationorganization made easy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy,40, 302-306.

Anderson-Inman, L. (1999). Computer-based solutions for secondary studentswith learning disabilities: Emerging issues. Reading and Writing Quarterly,15(3), 239-249. Retrieved November 21, 2000, from the World WideWeb: www.ldonline.com/ld_indepth/technology/anderson-inman_rwq.html

Anderson-Inman, L., & Horney. M. A. (1993, April). Profiles ofhypertext readers: Results from the ElectroText project. Paper presentedat the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,Atlanta.

Anderson-Inman, L., & Horney, M. A. (1998). Transforming text forat-risk readers. In D. Reinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, & R. D.Keiffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformationsin a post-typographic world (pp. 15-43). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.

Anderson-Inman, L., Horney, M. A., Chen, D., & Lewin, L. (1994).Hypertext literacy: Observations from the ElectroText Project. LanguageArts, 71(4), 37-45.

Anderson-Inman, L., Knox-Quinn, C., & Horney, M. A. (1996). Computer-basedstudy strategies for students with learning disabilities: Individual differencesassociated with adoption level. Journal of Learning Disabilities,29, 461-484.

Anderson-Inman, L., & Knox-Quinn, C. (1997/98). Empowering studentswith Powerbooks: Computer-based study strategies for students with learningdisabilities. Retrieved November 21, 2000, from the World Wide Web:www.ldonline.com/ld_indepth/technology/anderson_inman_nopics.html

Armbruster, B. B. (1984). The problem of "inconsiderate text." In G.Duffy, L. Roehler, & J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension instruction:Perspective and suggestions (pp. 202-217). New York: Longman.

Balmuth, M. (1982). The roots of phonics. New York: TeachersCollege Press.

Barker, T. A., & Torgesen, J. K. (1995). An evaluation of computer-assistedinstruction in phonological awareness with below average readers. Journalof Educational Computing Research, 13(1), 89-103.

Beck, I., & McKeown, M. (1996).Conditions of vocabulary acquisition. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal,& D. P. Pearson (Eds.) Handbook of reading research, Vol. 2.(pp. 789-814). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Becker, H. J. (1992). Computer-based integrated learning systems inthe elementary and middle grades: A critical review and synthesis of evaluationreports. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 1-41.

Becker, H. J. (1994). Mindless or mindful use of integrated learningsystems. International Journal of Educational Research, 21(1),65-79.

Bos, C. S., & Vaughn, S. (1998).Teaching students with learning and behavior problems (4^thed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Bransford, J. D., Sharp, D. M., Vye,N. J., Goldman, S. R., Hasselbring, T. S., Goin, L. O’Banion, K., Livernois,J., Saul, E., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt University.(1994, July-August). MOST environments for accelerating literacy development.Paper presented at NATO Advanced Study Institute on the Psychological andEducational Foundations of Technology-Based Learning Environments. Kolymbari,Crete.

Brush, T. A., Armstrong, J., Barbrow, D., & Ulintz, L. (1999). Designand delivery of integrated learning systems: Their impact on student achievementand attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21,475-486.

Burton-Radzely, L. (Ed). (1998).A national perspective on special educators’ use of technology to promoteliteracy: Technical report. Washington, DC: MACRO International andthe Council for Exceptional Children.

Chaffin, J. D., Maxwell, B., Thompson, B. (1982). The ARC-ED Curriculum:The application of video game formats to educational software. ExceptionalChildren, 49, 173-178.

Christensen, C. A., & Gerber, M. M. (1990). Effectiveness of computerizeddrill and practice games in teaching basic math facts. Exceptionality,1, 149-165.

Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media.Review of Educational Research, 53, 445-459.

Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich,K. E. (1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator,22 (1&2), 8-15.

Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker J.B. (1988). An instructional model for teaching students how to learn. InJ. L. Graden, J. E. Zins, & M. J. Curtis (Eds.). Alternative educationaldelivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students(pp. 391-411). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.

Durkin, D. (1993). Teaching themto read (6^th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Elkind, J. (1998). Computer reading machines for poor readers. Perspectives,24(2), 4-6.

Elkind, J., Cohen, K., & Murray, C. (1993). Using computer-basedreaders to improve reading comprehension of students with disabilities.Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 238-259.

Foster, K. C., Erickson, G. C., Foster,D. F., Brinkman, D., & Torgesen, J. K. (1994). Computer administeredinstruction in phonological awareness: Evaluation of the DaisyQuest program.Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27, 126-137.

Hasselbring, T. S., Goin, L. I., & Bransford, J. D. (1988). Developingmath automaticity in learning handicapped children: The role of computerizeddrill and practice. Focus on Exceptional Children, 220(6),1-7.

Hativa, N. (1988). Computer-based drill and practice in arithmetic:Widening the gap between high- and low-achieving students. AmericanEducational Research Journal, 25, 366-397.

Horney, J. A., & Anderson-Inman, L. (1994). The ElectroText project:Hypertext reading patterns of middle school students. Journal of EducationalMultimedia and Hypermedia, 3(1), 71-91.

Kamil, M., & Intrator, S. (1998).Quantitative trends in publication of research on technology and reading,writing, and literacy. In T. Shanahan & F. Rodriguez-Brown (Eds.).Forty-seventh Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 385-396).Chicago, IL: The National Reading Conference.

Leong, C. K. (1992). Enhancing readingcomprehension with text-to-speech (DECtalk) computer system. Readingand Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 205-217.

Leong, C. K. (1995). Effects of on-line reading and simultaneous DECtalkauding in helping below-average and poor readers comprehend and summarizetext. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 18, 101-116.

Lewis, R. (1996-2000). Project LITT: Literacy instruction through technology. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University. Retrieved December 8, 2000, from the World Wide Web:
http://edweb.sdsu.edu/SPED/LITT.html

Lewis, R. B. (1999). Reading software for students with learningdisabilities: Hypermedia-based children’s literature. Retrieved November 21, 2000, from the World Wide Web:
www.ldonline.com/ld_indepth/technology/lewis_rdgsftware.html

MacArthur, C. A., & Haynes, J.B. (1995). Student Assistant for Learning from Text (SALT): A hypermediareading aid. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 150-159.

Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction.Cognitive Science, 4, 333-369.

Malouf, D. B. (1987-1988). The effectof instructional computer games on continuing student motivation. TheJournal of Special Education, 21, 27-38.

Martin, S. E. (1972). Nonalphabeticwriting systems: Some observations. In J. F. Kavanagh & I. G. Mattingly(Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationship between speechand reading (pp. 81-102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Mathes, P. G., & Torgesen, J.K. (2000). A call for equity in reading instruction for all students: Aresponse to Allington and Woodside-Jiron. Educational Researcher,29(6), 4-154.

Moats, L. C. (1998). Teaching decoding.American Educator, 22 (1&2), 42-49.

Montali, J., & Lewandowski, L.(1996). Bimodal reading: Benefits of a talking computer for average andless skilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29,271-279.

National Center for Education Statistics(1996). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 1994 readingreport card for the nation and status. (Report #96045) Washington,DC: Author.

National Reading Panel (2000). Teachingchildren to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific researchliterature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Reportof the subgroups. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Health and HumanServices.

Ogle, D. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active readingof expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39, 564-570.

Okolo, C. (1991). Learning and behaviorallyhandicapped students' perceptions of instructional and motivational featuresof computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Research on Computing inEducation, 24, 171-188.

Okolo, C. (1992). The effect of CAI format and initial attitude on thearithmetic facts proficiency and continuing motivation of students withlearning disabilities. Exceptionality, 3, 195-211.

Okolo, C. (in preparation). Youclick on it and things happen: The impact of animation in electronic storybooks.

Okolo, C. M., Bahr, C. M., & Rieth, H. J. (1993). A retrospectiveview of computer-based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology,12(2), 1-27.

Okolo, C. M., Cavalier, A. R., Ferretti, R. P., & MacArthur, C.A. (2000). Technology, literacy, and disabilities: A review of the research.In R. Gersten, E. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.). Contemporary specialeducation research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructionalissues (pp. 179-250). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Okolo, C., & Hayes, R. (1996, April). The impact on animationin CD-ROM books on students’ reading behaviors and comprehension. Paperpresented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.New York.

Okolo, C., Hinsey, M., & Yousefian, B. (1990). Learning disabledstudents' acquisition of keyboarding skills and continuing motivation underdrill-and-practice and game conditions. Learning Disabilities Research,5, 100-109.

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoringactivities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117-175.

Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., &Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review ofthe intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2),181-221.

Salisbury, D. F. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications forthe designing drill and practice programs for computers. Journal ofComputer-Based Education, 17, 22-30.

Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., &Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulty in young children.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Mattheweffect in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisitionof literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.

Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progressin understanding reading. New York: The Guilford Press.

Tallal, P., Miller, S. L., Bedi, G., Byma, G., Wang, X., Nagarajan,S. S., Schriener, C., Jenkins, W. M., & Merzenich, M. M. (1996). Languagecomprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acousticallymodified speech. Science, 271, 81-84.

Tallal, P., Miller, S. L., Jenkins,W. M., & Merzenich, M. (1997). The role of temporal processing in developmentallanguage-based disorders: Research and clinical implications. In B. A.Blachman (Ed.). Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia(pp. 49-66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Taylor, B. M., Anderson, R. C., Au, K. H., & Raphael, T. E. (2000).Discretion in translation of research to policy: A case from beginningreading. Educational Researcher, 29(6), 16-26.

Torgesen, J. K. (1998). Catch them before they fall. American Educator,22 (1&2), 32-39.

Wise, B. W., Olson, R. K., Ring, J., & Johnson, M. (1998). Interactivecomputer support for improving phonological skills. In J. L. Metsala &L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 189-208).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.