








KUPPL
The University of Kansas
15 Blake Hall
Lawrence, KS 66045-3129
Phone: 785-864-3414
Fax: 785-864-5724
|
|
Language and Speech, 1992, 35(1,
2), 137-152
The phonlogical representation of [voice] in
speech perception
Allard Jongman, Joan A. Sereno, Marianne
Raaijmakers,
and Aditi Lahiri
|
This paper examines to what extent
phonological
representations affect word identification. The contrast under investigation
involves the interaction between voicing and vowel length in Dutch. Dutch
has underlying contrasts both in obstruent voicing and in vowel length.
The voicing contrast is neutralized on the surface in syllable-final position.
Also, both long and short vowels are lengthened by some 25 msec when followed
by medial voiced obstruents. The present study investigated whether this
vowel length cue influenced listeners when hearing stimuli with ambiguous
vowel duration in an identical, neutralized consonantal context in which
the underlying representation of the obstruent following the vowel
differed in voicing. A vowel length continuum (tat] to [a:t]) was created
and appended to initial consonants to make two pairs of real words. Each
pair differed in vowel length with opposite underlying final consonant
representations: /zat/-/za :d/, and /stad/-/sta:t/. Our question was whether
the vowel category boundaries would be different in pairs like /zat/-/za
:d/ as compared to /stad/-/sta :t/. Although the underlying consonant
is either voiced or voiceless, the surface word-final consonant for both
pairs of stimuli is always voiceless ([t] ). If the listener uses a surface
representation with a voiceless consonant to recognize the words, there
should be no difference in categorization of the vowel-length continua.
The results of a vowel categorization task, however, showed a significant
difference in the location of the phoneme boundaries between the two continua,
suggesting that listeners' perception seems to be guided by the underlying
phonological representation of words.
|
|
|