Management Guides for Control Self Assessment
Fiscal oversight is one of the primary responsibilities of any manager. This responsibility requires an understanding
of some basic internal control concepts that need be applied and reviewed on
a periodic basis. In some cases, department and unit administrators may not be
familiar with financial management and related internal control issues. For
this reason, the KU Internal Audit Office designed three control self-assessment
guides to assist administrators in carrying out their responsibilities to evaluate
administrative and financial controls.
Even though many financial transactions
are ultimately reviewed through the central administration, nothing can replace the direct involvement of department administrators
and managers in monitoring financial activities. The purpose of the control self-assessment
guides (referenced below) is to help these individuals understand some of the more important control
issues and assist them in conducting an assessment of a department’s policies,
procedures and related fiscal controls. Of course, additional assistance will
continue to be available from Comptroller and Internal Audit Offices on campus as referenced in
the self-assessment guides.
The control self-assessment guidelines address three of the biggest problem areas for department administrators: (1)
handling cash,
(2)
making purchases and authorizing payments, and (3)
controlling property.
(Click on highlighted topics to access.) We have designed the guides to assist
administrators in determining whether existing departmental controls are sufficient to prevent or detect problems and to aid the creation of effective
control systems where needed. In order to minimize the time required, each
guide can be applied separately and includes only those essential
controls that should be evaluated at the department level.
Department administrators should
have their financial controls evaluated using the self-assessment guides at
least once a year and more frequently when conditions warrant. These evaluations
would be most effective if conducted by individuals not directly involved in the
day-to-day fiscal activity being reviewed. Large departments may have administrative
personnel who can conduct the evaluations and review results with the
chairperson. In smaller departments, the chairperson may need to conduct the
review or appoint a designated representative. The results of these periodic
reviews should be used to make improvements in administrative and financial controls.
The self-assessment guides provide
a series of questions that can help determine whether
key features of an effective control system are in place. While all controls
are important, Internal Audit has accumulated the following list of issues that
deserve special attention based on problems encountered in the past. (Note:
Many of the following issues, as well as the controls mentioned in the referenced
self-assessment guides, will apply to a department's KU Endowment and KUCR funds in addition to
University accounts.)
- Separation of duties. One person should not have complete control over an
entire process or fiscal activity without any oversight. For example, no one person should be able to prepare a
transaction, approve and process it, and then reconcile department records
to the university’s accounting system or related systems. Otherwise, a person may be able
to spend university funds for private purposes without detection or put someone
on the payroll inappropriately. To help achieve adequate separation of duties, Internal Audit recommends that
managers get involved in the financial administration of their departments. For example, we suggest that department chairs routinely approve financial transactions and then review the financial and budgetary status of their departments on a monthly basis uaing available reports or system inquiry techniques. In smaller departments where separation of responsibility may be harder to
achieve, the involvement of the chairperson or other high-level administrator in the financial approval and review process becomes imperative.
- Adequate organization and record keeping. Administrative duties should
be clearly defined and documented in job descriptions. Departmental policies
and procedures should be in writing to facilitate management review and employee
training and cross-training. Copies of transaction logs, vouchers, invoices,
timesheets or work schedules, deposit slips, and other pertinent source documents
should be organized to facilitate any reasonable need to reconstruct activity.
- Account reconciliations. A department's receipts, expenditures, and account balances must be checked (reconciled) to the
university’s systems on a regular basis. Otherwise, errors or misconduct
in the accounts may not be detected. For example, revenue deposits may
not be credited to the right department, expenditures may be inappropriately
charged to the wrong account, or employees may be getting inappropriate pay or overtime.
We suggest that department administrators become familiar with available financial
reports or system inquiry methods and then review transactions along with fund balances on a regular basis with the employee responsible for the detailed monthly reconciliation to University systems.
- Authorizations/Signatures.
The authority to approve/sign purchase orders, expenditure transaction logs and payroll
appointments should be made in writing by the department head, keeping in mind the need for adequate separation of duties as
discussed above. The person who approves a transaction is responsible for
determining if the transaction is appropriate. This responsibility should
be performed by the department chair or a designated representative
not involved in the preparation of the documents or the reconciliation of department records to University systems.
- Revenue
Collection Process. The collection of funds obviously involves
special risk, and the process must be controlled and well documented. Prenumbered
receipts are normally used to establish accountability for funds collected unless some other acceptable method is available such as a cash register. When prenumbered receipts are used, a receipt book should be
assigned to each employee collecting funds, and the receipts should be reconciled to the funds collected. Each person handling cash should have his/her own cash box or other means to safeguard funds so that they
are the only ones with access. When funds are transferred to others, the
funds should be counted and the transfer documented. The person receiving
the funds should sign for the amount received. Revenue should be deposited
with the Comptroller's office daily if possible. Do not hold receipts over
a weekend. Deposits should be reconciled to the receipt books or other accountability documents,
and a record of the deposit should be maintained and reconciled monthly to
the University’s financial system.
- Inventory.
Departments should maintain a "vulnerable items" list of equipment costing less than $5,000 that is considered highly vulnerable to theft. All goods ordered by the department should be delivered to the department and not a home address.
- System
passwords. Individual computer passwords should be kept confidential
and periodically changed (every 90 days unless otherwise directed by the system
administrator). Passwords should be not be left on desks, monitors,
under keyboards and phones, etc.
- Computer
backup. Procedures should be in place to ensure computer files
can be restored if needed. Computer files should be backed up
on a regular basis and the backup files stored in a safe location, preferably
in an off-site location or fire-proof room.
- Federal
tax or state sales tax issues. If a department collects funds
from a source other than faculty, staff, and students, there may be exposure
to federal tax called “Unrelated Business Income Tax” or UBIT. A department
may also encounter certain other federal income tax or state sales tax issues under
certain conditions. Any tax question should be referred to the University
Tax Analyst, Robbie Vannaman, at 4-3786.